我有三张桌子:
文字:行中的文字
trigram:所有文字行的trigram
text_trigram:文本行包含的三字母组,中间表
当我执行此命令时:
select count(coalesce(text_id,0)), text_id from text_trigram where text_id in (1, 2, 3) and trigram_id = 1 group by text_id;
结果出来了,却没有null我想要的结果0:
null
0
count|text_id 1 1 1 2
这是我除了拥有的东西:
count|text_id 1 1 1 2 0 3
此外,我想执行以下操作:
select count(coalesce(text_id,0)), text_id from text_trigram where text_id in (1, 2, 3) and trigram_id in (1, 2, 3) group by text_id; count|text_id|trigram_id 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 3 0 3 1
有可能的?还是使用in运算符是错误的?
in
我认为这里的困惑是您假设的值为null text_id=3,但实际上 没有匹配的行 。考虑以下简化版本:
text_id=3
select * from text_trigram where text_id in (3)
如果没有带有的条目,则不会返回任何行text_id=3。它不会伪造一行带有一串空值的行。
为了即使没有匹配的数据也强制存在一行,您可以创建一个包含这些ID的表表达式,例如
select * from ( values (1), (2), (3) ) as required_ids ( text_id );
然后是LEFT JOIN您的数据,因此您可以NULL找到没有匹配数据的地方:
LEFT JOIN
NULL
select * from ( values (1), (2), (3) ) as required_ids ( text_id ) left join text_trigram on text_trigram.text_id = required_ids.text_id;
要进行第一个查询,请注意两件事:
count
count(text_trigram.text_id)
text_trigram
任何额外条件都需要放在的on子句中left join,以便它们从中消除行text_trigram,而不是整个查询中的行
on
left join
select count(text_trigram.text_id), required_ids.text_id from ( values (1), (2), (3) ) as required_ids ( text_id ) left join text_trigram on text_trigram.text_id = required_ids.text_id and text_trigram.trigram_id = 1 group by text_id order by text_id;
此更改为每个排列text_id并trigram_id只想涉及额外的表表达式和CROSS JOIN:
text_id
trigram_id
CROSS JOIN
select required_text_ids.text_id, required_trigram_ids.trigram_id, count(text_trigram.text_id) from ( values (1), (2), (3) ) as required_text_ids( text_id ) cross join ( values (1), (2), (3) ) as required_trigram_ids( trigram_id ) left join text_trigram on text_trigram.text_id = required_text_ids.text_id and text_trigram.trigram_id = required_trigram_ids.trigram_id group by required_text_ids.text_id, required_trigram_ids.trigram_id order by required_text_ids.text_id, required_trigram_ids.trigram_id;