一尘不染

sys.stats_columns 不正确吗?

sql-server

假设我有一个Foo包含列的表ID1, ID2和一个复合主键定义在ID2, ID1. (我目前正在使用一个 System Center 产品,该产品具有以这种方式定义的多个表,主键列以它们在表定义中出现的相反顺序列出。)

CREATE TABLE dbo.Foo(
  ID1 int NOT NULL,
  ID2 int NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Foo] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (ID2, ID1)
);
GO

-- Add a row and update stats so that histogram isn't empty
INSERT INTO Foo (ID1, ID2) VALUES (1,2);
UPDATE STATISTICS dbo.Foo;

中的key_ordinal列以sys.index_columns与复合主键中声明的顺序相同的顺序显示索引列:

SELECT t.name, i.name, c.column_id, c.name, ic.index_column_id, ic.key_ordinal
FROM sys.tables AS t
JOIN sys.indexes AS i
ON t.[object_id] = i.[object_id]
JOIN sys.index_columns AS ic
ON ic.[object_id] = i.[object_id]
AND ic.index_id = i.index_id
JOIN sys.columns AS c
ON ic.column_id = c.column_id
AND ic.[object_id] = c.[object_id]
WHERE t.name = 'Foo';

指数

直方图还以相同的顺序显示统计信息:

DBCC SHOW_STATISTICS ('Foo',PK_Foo);

统计数据

但是,sys.stats_columns显示以相反顺序列出的列 ( ID1, ID2)。

SELECT s.name, sc.stats_column_id, c.name
FROM sys.stats AS s
JOIN sys.stats_columns AS sc 
ON s.stats_id = sc.stats_id 
AND s.[object_id] = sc.[object_id] 
JOIN sys.columns AS c 
ON c.[object_id] = s.[object_id]
AND c.column_id = sc.column_id
JOIN sys.objects AS o 
ON o.[object_id] = c.[object_id] 
WHERE o.name = 'Foo'
AND s.name = 'PK_Foo';

stats_columns

Books Onlinestats_column_id是“一组统计列中基于 1 的序数”,所以我期望值 1 指向统计对象中的第一列。

这是sys.stats_columns我的错误还是误解?

我已验证此行为发生在 SQL Server 2005、2008、2008 R2、2012 和 2014 的当前版本上。

sys.stats_columns似乎在其他情况下反映了统计对象内的顺序,例如:

CREATE TABLE dbo.Foo2(
  ID1 int NOT NULL,
  ID2 int NOT NULL,
  ID3 int NULL,
  String VARCHAR(10) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Foo2] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (ID2, ID1)
);

GO

INSERT INTO Foo2 (ID1, ID2, ID3, String) VALUES (1,2,3,'String');

CREATE STATISTICS ST_Test ON Foo2 (ID3, String);
CREATE STATISTICS ST_Test2 ON Foo2 (String, ID3);

DBCC SHOW_STATISTICS ('Foo2',ST_Test);
DBCC SHOW_STATISTICS ('Foo2',ST_Test2);


SELECT s.name, sc.stats_column_id, c.name
FROM sys.stats AS s
JOIN sys.stats_columns AS sc 
ON s.stats_id = sc.stats_id 
AND s.[object_id] = sc.[object_id] 
JOIN sys.columns AS c 
ON c.[object_id] = s.[object_id]
AND c.column_id = sc.column_id
JOIN sys.objects AS o 
ON o.[object_id] = c.[object_id] 
WHERE o.name = 'Foo2'
AND s.name LIKE 'ST_Test%';

更多统计

这是另一个sys.stats_columns似乎返回正确数据的示例,这次是针对索引的统计信息:

--drop table dbo.Foo3
CREATE TABLE dbo.Foo3(
  ID1 int NOT NULL,
  ID2 int NOT NULL,
  ID3 int NULL,
  String VARCHAR(10) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Foo3] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (ID2, ID1)
);

GO

INSERT INTO Foo3 (ID1, ID2, ID3, String) VALUES (1,2,3,'String');
UPDATE STATISTICS Foo3;

CREATE INDEX IX_Test ON Foo3 (ID3, String);
CREATE INDEX IX_Test2 ON Foo3 (String, ID3);

DBCC SHOW_STATISTICS ('Foo3',IX_Test);
DBCC SHOW_STATISTICS ('Foo3',IX_Test2);

SELECT s.name, sc.stats_column_id, c.name
FROM sys.stats AS s
JOIN sys.stats_columns AS sc 
ON s.stats_id = sc.stats_id 
AND s.[object_id] = sc.[object_id] 
JOIN sys.columns AS c 
ON c.[object_id] = s.[object_id]
AND c.column_id = sc.column_id
JOIN sys.objects AS o 
ON o.[object_id] = c.[object_id] 
WHERE o.name = 'Foo3'
AND s.name LIKE 'IX_Test%';

更多更多统计


阅读 79

收藏
2022-11-11

共1个答案

一尘不染

这似乎是一个长期存在的错误:

MSDN 指出 sys.stats_columns.stats_column_id 是“一组统计数据列中基于 1 的序数”。但是,它似乎实际上反映了表定义顺序。更改索引顺序不会反映在 sys.stats_columns 中。

Max Vernon 和 James Lupolt 似乎基于他们的评论/鼓励而同意。

2022-11-11