您只能使用Logstash
aggregate过滤器来实现此目的，但是，您必须实质性地重新实现该elapsed过滤器已经完成的功能，这样会很丢人吧？

然后，让我们混合使用Logstash
aggregate过滤器和elapsedfilter。后者用于测量每个阶段的时间，而前者用于将所有计时信息汇总到最后一个事件中。

旁注：您可能想重新考虑您的时间戳格式，使其更符合解析标准。我将它们转换为ISO 8601以使其更易于解析，但是可以随意滚动自己的正则表达式。

因此，我从以下日志开始：

2016-05-19T02:55:29.003 00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775 system1Enter
2016-05-19T02:55:29.200 00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775 system1Exit
2016-05-19T02:55:29.205 00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775 system2Enter
2016-05-19T02:55:29.453 00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775 system2Exit

首先，我使用三个elapsed过滤器（每个阶段一个in1，1->2然后使用in2），然后使用三个聚合过滤器以收集所有时序信息。看起来像这样：

filter {
  grok {
    match => ["message", "%{TIMESTAMP_ISO8601:timestamp} %{UUID:messageId} %{WORD:event}"]
    add_tag => [ "%{event}" ]
  }
  date {
    match => [ "timestamp", "ISO8601"]
  }
  # Measures the execution time of system1
  elapsed {
    unique_id_field => "messageId"
    start_tag => "system1Enter"
    end_tag => "system1Exit"
    new_event_on_match => true
    add_tag => ["in1"]
  }
  # Measures the execution time of system2
  elapsed {
    unique_id_field => "messageId"
    start_tag => "system2Enter"
    end_tag => "system2Exit"
    new_event_on_match => true
    add_tag => ["in2"]
  }
  # Measures the time between system1 and system2
  elapsed {
    unique_id_field => "messageId"
    start_tag => "system1Exit"
    end_tag => "system2Enter"
    new_event_on_match => true
    add_tag => ["1->2"]
  }
  # Records the execution time of system1
  if "in1" in [tags] and "elapsed" in [tags] {
    aggregate {
      task_id => "%{messageId}"
      code => "map['report'] = [(event['elapsed_time']*1000).to_i]"
      map_action => "create"
    }
  }
  # Records the time between system1 and system2
  if "1->2" in [tags] and "elapsed" in [tags] {
    aggregate {
      task_id => "%{messageId}"
      code => "map['report'] << (event['elapsed_time']*1000).to_i"
      map_action => "update"
    }
  }
  # Records the execution time of system2
  if "in2" in [tags] and "elapsed" in [tags] {
    aggregate {
      task_id => "%{messageId}"
      code => "map['report'] << (event['elapsed_time']*1000).to_i; event['report'] = map['report'].join(':')"
      map_action => "update"
      end_of_task => true
    }
  }
}

在前两个事件之后，您将获得一个类似这样的新事件，该事件表明在system1中已经花费了197ms：

{
                 "@timestamp" => "2016-05-21T04:20:51.731Z",
                       "tags" => [ "elapsed", "elapsed_match", "in1" ],
               "elapsed_time" => 0.197,
                  "messageId" => "00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775",
    "elapsed_timestamp_start" => "2016-05-19T00:55:29.003Z"
}

在第三个事件之后，您将获得一个类似这样的事件，该事件显示在system1和system2之间花费了多少时间，即5毫秒：

{
                 "@timestamp" => "2016-05-21T04:20:51.734Z",
                       "tags" => [ "elapsed", "elapsed_match", "1->2" ],
               "elapsed_time" => 0.005,
                  "messageId" => "00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775",
    "elapsed_timestamp_start" => "2016-05-19T00:55:29.200Z"
}

在第四个事件之后，您将获得一个类似这样的新事件，该事件显示了system2中花费了多少时间，即248ms。该事件还包含一个report字段，其中包含消息的所有计时信息

{
                 "@timestamp" => "2016-05-21T04:20:51.736Z",
                       "tags" => [ "elapsed", "elapsed_match", "in2" ],
               "elapsed_time" => 0.248,
                  "messageId" => "00e02f2f-32d5-9509-870a-f80e54dc8775",
    "elapsed_timestamp_start" => "2016-05-19T00:55:29.205Z"
                     "report" => "197:5:248"
}